Talk:2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Mandarax (talk19:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Already appeared on ITN, so ineligible for DYK per Rule 1d.

  • Reviewed: To be completed
  • Comment: Article is also nominated for ITN here; if both nominations are successful, the ITN blurb will likely exit the main page before this is posted.

5x expanded by PCN02WPS (talk). Self-nominated at 04:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC).Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2022 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship Game which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 17:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this within a week. -Riley1012 (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

1. Well-written

  • "They were awarded an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament, and received the No. 1 seed in the South Regional." remove the comma
  • "The pre-game and post-game shows included analysis by Greg Gumbel, Clark Kellogg, Kenny Smith, and Charles Barkley, Seth Davis, and Jim Jackson" This could be re-written into two sentences by separating the analysts for the pre-game and post-game shows (ex: The pre-game show included analysis by Greg...., and the post-game show included Charles...")

2. Verifiable

Ref layout is good and copyvio check looks good.

3. Broad

Article is focused

4. Neutral
Article is neutral in its coverage

5. Stable
Article is stable

6. Illustrated
One photo of MOP Jared Butler is free use

-Riley1012 (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Riley1012: I think this is ready for another look! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@PCN02WPS: Okay, the changes look good to me! -Riley1012 (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk22:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by PCN02WPS (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   For the main hook, I think we are going with "NCAA tournament" (lowercase) now, since the tournament pages got moved to lowercase "t".[1] Also, would something like "... top two overall seeds of the NCAA tournament" read better, or even just plain "feature the top two overall seeds of the tournament"? —Bagumba (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bagumba: I think something like "... that the 2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game between Baylor and Gonzaga was the first since 2005 to feature the top two overall seeds of the NCAA tournament?" with the same wikilinks. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Onegreatjoke: Go ahead place it here as an ALT2 (with the formatting), and I can approve it. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bagumba: Alt2 "... that the 2021 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game between Baylor and Gonzaga was the first since 2005 to feature the top two overall seeds of the NCAA tournament?" Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Approved ALT2. ALT1 with "massive blowout" seemed like too much of cliche to be interesting.—Bagumba (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply