This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I have added several hypertext links to candidates' previous candidatures. However an anonymous user keeps removing these links thereby reducing functionality. Why? Pat.moloney (talk) 01:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I disagree that these links are justified. I believe you are inappropriately acting in a partisan way. I have added information relating to candidates who have served as councilors before and done so without partisan favor. 2A00:23C6:D529:4601:4561:7360:A1B4:AC9B (talk) 02:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have only added a few hypertext links so far, which are repeatedly deleted. I have added these links to previous years election results to make it easier for readers to trace candidates. This will be a massive task to complete and I would welcome collaboration. To remove these links repeatedly is vandalism. Nothing I have added is false. To accuse me of partisanship on such a small number of changes is wrong when clearly the task is incomplete. Can I suggest that in the interests of transparency thay you do not post anonymously. Pat.moloney (talk) 02:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Whay is adding functionality 'instigating vandalism'?
Hypertext links are used in many election results pages to link :
1 individual candidate's pages
2 political party pages
3 ward information pages
4 definitions of relevant terms
5 Relevant Acts of Parliament
5 Other relevant information
6 References
As hypertext links to previous election results add functionality by making it easier for users to follow the political careers of candidates, I contend that this functionality is worthwhile.
So why are you opposed to hypertext links to previous elections that candidates have stood? You have to date given no rational reason why they should be removed other than that 'these links are not features of any election page'.Examples can be found in :
That is a very good question. Several councillors have announced that they are standing down and have subsequently become candidates in other wards. It can be assumed that they are 'paper' candidates, not expecting to win in the wards that they are standing. Pat.moloney (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
