A news item involving 2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 April 2023.
A fact from 2023 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
For an easy comparison, I went directly to the 2022 championship game article (which is already a GA due to your work, good job!) and examined that one. It is exactly similar to this one; all the points made in that GA review apply here, generally speaking.
Sourcing is good and reliable; had an issue with one source (I can't view it) but I'm just going to assume good faith due to the quality of all the other sources. No edit wars, every section is adequately cited, addresses the salient points of the game (addresses all the points of the game down to each and every shot, which might be trending towards going into unnecessary detail, but I think we're fine), is well-written, verifiable, neutrally worded and stable.
It has no images. Images aren't strictly necessary for something like this, but, in a case where there are hundreds of relevant images available online, one or two would be good. However, I don't think it matters all too much.
Based on all this, I think this passes the GA criteria. Good job!
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.