Talk:3D printed medication
Latest comment: 4 months ago by BrandonXLF in topic Proposed merge of 3D printed medicine into 3D drug printing
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of 3D printed medicine was merged into 3D drug printing with this edit on 03:36, 20 June 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Proposed merge of 3D printed medicine into 3D drug printing
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge 3D printed medicine into 3D drug printing. – BrandonXLF (talk) 03:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Same topic (t · c) buidhe 01:51, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support – I support "3D printed medicine" being merged into "3D drug printing" because "3D drug printing" has more content. However I think that "3D printed medicine" is a better title for the article and that "3D drug printing" is too colloquial. In this case, I believe that "3D printed medicine" should be merged into "3D drug printing" and then the article name should be changed to "3D printed medicine" for the reasons specified. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support merge of content, and then 3D printed medicine should redirect to Applications of 3D printing#Medical applications; it is a broader topic, as per medicine vs medication. To avoid colloquialism in title, merged content may be moved to 3D printed medication. —Ost (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I updated the page to clarify the two topics. —Ost (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.