Talk:766th Independent Infantry Regiment (North Korea)/GA1

Reviewer: WikiCopter (talk) 00:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
1. Well-written.

A. The prose is clear and concise, and spelling and grammar are correct.  
Comments '766th Unit' doesn't sound right. Can you do a regex with a script and replace it with the apparent standard, '766th?' WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 03:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've done this in some cases, but "766th Unit" is the standard, from a North Korean perspective. —Ed!(talk) 18:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
B. Meets the Manual of Style.  

2. Well-sourced.

A. Provides sources in the correct section per the guide to layout.  
B. Provides in-line citations.  
Comments not a prerequisite, but citations in the lead would be appreciated.
C. Contains no original research.  

3. Broad in coverage.

A. Addresses the main topics.  
B. Stays focused.  

4. NPOV.   5. Stable.   6. Images.

A. Properly tagged and are not copyvios.  
B. Relevant and have proper captions.  
Comments Add image (preferably the map if you have none) to the infobox.
Nevermind. WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 01:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

7. Overall  

A. Onhold.

Reviewer: WikiCopter (radiosortiesimagesshot down) 00:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply