Talk:8mm (film)

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Hanz ofbyotch in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

Great movie but highly sadophobic. --Nemissimo 18:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I agree, people who enjoy inflicting and witnessing the pain of other people have got a bad rap in this film Gomez2002 18:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm struck by the similarities between 8mm and the film Hardcore, a Paul Schrader film starring George C. Scott, released in 1979. Both films turn around a young girl who runs away from home and is possibly involved in a snuff film; both films have a detective searching for her. Both films have the protagonist traveling to California and searching in the porn subculture for the girl. In both films the protagonist picks up a sidekick/guide/amanuensis from the porn community; in Hardcore, it's both the detective and a female sex worker, while in 8mm, it's a male adult bookstore clerk. In both films, the protagonist finds it necessary to do a fair amount of dissembling in the course of his search. Both films have a strong male lead. In Hardcore, it's the father who's searching for the girl, helped to some extent by the detective; 8mm seems essentially to be a retelling of the same story, leaving the father out and taking the detective's point of view. The similarities are so strong that it's hard for me to believe that it's a coincidence, that they're completely unrelated. Anyone else seen both these films and had a similar impression? --71.226.152.210 02:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't remember the song in Machine's house being Aphex Twin, I remember it being a DANZIG song.Hanz ofbyotch 23:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:8MM.jpg

edit

I found Image:8MM.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 04:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:8MM.jpg

edit
 

Image:8MM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 04:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply