Talk:ARP Instruments

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ritchie333 in topic Won't Get Fooled Again

I recommend the famous clients section be alphabetised and any performers without articles on them be removed (even if there is an article on a group or collective to which they belong) because they certainly don't fall under the category of "famous". 70.48.248.59 (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Famous clients list

edit

There is lengthy list of famous clients on the page. According to WP:NLIST a source should be given to each and every one. There are several vintage electronic music websites with such lists, e.g. Vintage Synth Explorer and Alternative-Electronics (which Surv1v4l1st mentioned) but I'm not sure they satisfy WP:V. Can someone supply any information on their editorial merit? Otherwise I think sources will have to be given for every name. I think that if we don't accept any of the lists, album personnel lists might provide sources. For instance David Bowie in Low (album) used an arp and is listed as such. --Muhandes (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I added a source for Bowie and Eno playing arp on Low (album). Do we want to add sources for artists that mention arp in their own page? I didn't add {{cn}} for them.--Muhandes (talk) 05:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for starting the talk page entry. I removed the two cites mentioned above. The first does appear to fail WP:V. The latter is more difficult to determine editorial oversight, but some of the material points to it lacking said.
The linear notes on albums may indeed be a good starting point as some do list an Arp. Also, interviews in Keyboard Magazine and Keyboard Player Magazine often, though not always, touch upon the topic of equipment. That may be another source to pursue. --Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 13:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Not a valid source, but a list also here--Muhandes (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced clients

edit

Moved from page:

--Muhandes (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

--Muhandes (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ARP Instruments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ARP Instruments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Won't Get Fooled Again

edit

1970 - ARP 2500 (large and complex analog modular synthesizer, patched with a switch matrix, noted for its reliable tuning compared to competitors Moog and Buchla. Almost identical to the ARP 2002, except that the upper switch matrix had 20 buses instead of 10.); the ARP 2500 is the synthesizer heard on 'Won't Get Fooled Again' by The Who.
— ARP Instruments#Product highlights

I seem to recall a documentary saying that some type of organ was routed through the ARP 2500 and was then modulated to provide the famous pulsing soun. Anyone concur? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijustwannabeawinner (talkcontribs) 04:42, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it was a Lowrey Berkshire Deluxe TBO-1 Home Organ fed into an EMS VCS3. He didn't get the 2500 until after the Who's Next demos ie: after the WGFA backing track. See here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply