Talk:AT Protocol
Latest comment: 1 month ago by LemurianPatriot in topic "ATproto" or "atproto"?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AT Protocol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"ATproto" or "atproto"?
editShould the abbreviation for the protocol be written as "ATProto" or "atproto"? Official documentation often uses "atproto" (here's a blog post as an example), and I believe Bluesky PBC intends for it to be pronounced "at-proto", (as in the @ sign), hence the lowercase. However, colloquially, people often use both versions (or "AT Proto", with the letters pronounced individually) interchangeably. Baldemoto (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think that it should be "ATproto", as it looks more visually discernible and is the capitalization that most people and developers are actively using for that abbreviation. LemurianPatriot (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just did a search for "atproto/ATproto" and "AT Proto" on both the API Discord and Bluesky itself. It seems like "atproto" is the predominant abbreviation, but "ATProto" is not uncommon either (maybe 1/4th of total results?) "AT Proto" is basically never used.
- Maybe both abbreviations can be added for the time being until we can pick out a discernible long-term trend over those two? Baldemoto (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would be fine. LemurianPatriot (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)