This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Where are the reviews of this work? @Sitush: and others, including possibly Lankiveil, do not feel that this is a reliable source. This would be a good place to cite the RSs that criticise both this work and the census data upon which is was based. --Bejnar (talk) 02:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just to clarify my earlier comment, I believe that all works from the era should be used with caution, especially in such cases where they make claims that aren't supported by any other sources. I don't have any opinion about this particular work beyond that. Lankiveil(speak to me)02:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC).Reply
Yes, there should be a discussion of the reliability of this work, based on the opinions of the experts (outside of wikipedia editors). What facts/opinions included this book are not reliable, and what are reliable? How are these views justified?. What are all works from the era? Is that all works in India, or all works globally? What period is "this era", and who determined that? Malaiya (talk) 22:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply