Talk:A Ruined Life
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from A Ruined Life appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that A Ruined Life was the first film by director Victor Sjöström to be shown in Sweden because his earlier film, The Gardener, was censored for 68 years? Sources: "... entre las que destacan su debut Ett Hemligt Giftermål (1912) ..." from [1] (in Spanish); "Le premier film de Victor Sjöström, le Jardinier, réalisé en 1912, avait disparu après avoir été interdit par la censure et n'avoir jamais été officiellement distribué... sa première projection publique suédoise n'a eu lieu que le 1er novembre 1980, soit 68 ans après sa réalisation." from Positif source (in French)
- ALT1:... that the 1912 silent film A Ruined Life was the debut film of Swedish actors Greta Almroth and Richard Lund? Source: "Filmen innebar debut i film för såväl Greta Almroth som Richard Lund." from [2] (in Swedish)
- Reviewed: Poème roumain
5x expanded by DanCherek (talk). Self-nominated at 18:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC).
- Before expansion, the character count was 234 according to Special:PermanentLink/1001582327, after expansion the prose count stands at 3604 Special:PermanentLink/1011040091, so 5X expanded within the last seven days. The article is new enough, long enough, well-referenced, neutrally written with no significant copyvios (score amazing at 2.9%). Both hooks are cited-inline in the article and are interesting; either could be used but I prefer the first hook. The source is in foreign language so I'll AGF on it. A QPQ has been done by the nominator. Good to go! :) Ashleyyoursmile! 05:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)