Talk:Abella Danger
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real name/descent
editThe real name mentioned in the previous version of the article and her supposed Cuban descent is not mentioned anywhere in the referenced sources, I therefore removed it.
In addition, adding a real name to the page of a sex worker, when it is not common knowledge and/or was published by themselves can actually pose a safety risk to them, any such addition should probably be carefully considered beforehand.Bip01 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This is just ridiculous
editShe has the same amount of information as any other adult actress. There is adequate and quick information that may be garnered from the box with her information. Being in the profession she is in, there is not much personal information that should be released. There is enough information related to this person without providing a full biography or similar type information.
Scenicview1 (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Scenicview1
I agree with the sources
editAppears to be all good now. Please take this notice down from the page.
Scenicview1 (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Scenicview1
issue has been resolved
editIt appears the issue has been resolved and adequately taken care of. I'm removing this talk page. Unless someone else has any issues. Thank you.
--Scenicview1 (talk) 18:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Scenicview1
Page image question
editI note that an IP recently changed the image of the subject to, shall we say, one with less formal attire, which change was quickly reverted by User:Sangdeboeuf, saying "WP is not a porn site". While this is true, the article subject is a pornographic actress, so I am wondering if it doesn't make sense to have an image this is somewhat more representative of the typical appearance of the subject. BD2412 T 12:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think Danger's typical professional appearance is more or less complete nudity, which would not be appropriate here. I think we should avoid
titillatingrisqué photos for the lead section in general because Wikipedia's purpose is to inform, not to arouse. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 12:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC) edited 13:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- For context, here are the images at issue. The second (the one added by the IP), is clearly more risque; I don't know if I would call it "titillating":
- The first image is the main one at the subject's Commons category page, which is the main reason I chose it. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- For context, here are the images at issue. The second (the one added by the IP), is clearly more risque; I don't know if I would call it "titillating":