Talk:Adarnase of Hereti

Unsourced biased claims in the article

Unsourced and biased controversial claims of the article were removed. The theory of Armenian historians are mentioned separately. Lemabeta (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

You can't have it both ways; removing this per "outdated" but ignoring the Georgian origin which is also cited by this same source of 1849? Why you didn't remove that too? There is an entire paragraph about Georgian origin only cited by this "outdated" "AGEMATTERS" (your own words) source of Marie-Félicité Brosset, 1849. It's just laughable, this selective ridiculous editing. Also if you have sources disputing the current sources, cite them here - otherwise "AGEMATTERS" is irrelevant because for it to be relevant you have to prove that there are newer sources disputing the current ones, which you haven't. Speaking of disputing, I do have newer WP:RS disputing the old Marie-Félicité Brosset's 1849 book that you pick and choose so selectively only for Georgian origin, I added the newer expert on South Caucasus Robert H. Hewsen's source to the article [1] - how would you like if I do your type of edits now such as this [2], but instead of your WP:OR Georgian POV push, I actually have an expert reliable and newer than yours source that confirms him and his father to be Armenian? Vanezi (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

You cannot remove content [3] that literally sourced in the body which I already showed you above [4]. You also cannot change and revert something writing in your summary "Kindgom of Hereti was a Georgian kingdom, therefore making Adarnase a Georgian king" when you were the one who changed Kingdom of Hereti main article to "Georgian" [5]. If you read the article and its sources, the article actually says that Hereti was initially under the rule of Caucasian Albania, so your edit summary is at the very least dishonest and omitting context. Vanezi (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)