Fair use rationale for Image:Hypo.group.logo.png

edit
 

Image:Hypo.group.logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hypo Group Alpe Adria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

As the current references used for Addiko Bank dates from 2014 to 2016, I propose significant changes according to the latest sources as the current information are not up to date, e.g. the ownership, the scope of business, general information, incomplete history, irrelevant and inaccurate facts about Hypo Alpe Adria Mostar i Banja Luka, among others.

edit


  • As the current references used for Addiko Bank dates from 2014 to 2016 or earlier, I propose significant changes according to the latest sources as the current information are not up to date regarding almost everything, e.g. the ownership, the scope of business, general information, incomplete history, irrelevant and inaccurate facts about Hypo Alpe Adria Mostar i Banja Luka, among others.:
  • It should give an accurate info about Addiko Bank.:
  • [1] [2] .[3]:

RinaLina (talk) 13:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ https://www.addiko.com/static/uploads/Press-release_Addiko-Group-HV-en-1.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ Addiko Bank AG https://www.addiko.com/about-addiko/. Retrieved 7 January 2021. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ^ "Financial Report 2019" (PDF). Addiko Bank AG.
We don't usually use primary source as citation in wikipedia. Matthew hk (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please be more clear what changes you are asking for and supply reliable and independent sources to support said changes. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I suggest that if the original requester doesn't provide a suitable answer, we help clear the backlog and decline the edit request. @RinaLina: Would you please be so kind to jump in and provide details? Thank you. Ferkijel (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Information is outdated and does not match the german (up to date) version

edit

I noticed that the German and the English versions of the Wikipedia articles are very different and the English wiki page is no longer correct because the information is outdated. It would be great if someone could update the English Wikipedia page. Isi Lara TA (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply