This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
You can use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. When there is a consensus that the article is cleaned up please remove the cleanup tag from the article
I created this article but I am not sure what the problem here is. Could you point it out? User:Dimadick
The main thing that stuck me is that it is overlinked with red-links, which is unrecommended per WP:LINK and just looks bad. But, if you intend to create those pages, I guess it is ok. When I saw this page come in I also tagged it with no-context; I was trying to gauge if it was notable, and from the lead could not tell at all. But, I guess I was a little tag-happy there, as this person is of obvious historical significance, so feel free to remove it. My only other recommendations are to fill out the prose, and add another reference or two if you can. Danski1405:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hi, the idea of D. Miguel as an usurper is completely unacceptable and propaganda.
D. Miguel was the legitimate heir to the Portuguese throne ever since his brother declared the independence of Brazil, became ruler of a foreign country and waged war against Portugal.
There is no doubt whatsoever that D. Miguel, according to the laws of the Kingdom of Portugal back then was the legitimate successor to the throne Portugal.
Also, the painting of the civil war as a confrontation between "progressive constitutionalists" and "authoritarian absolutists" is really a gross simplification.
Especially when you consider that the legitimate King, D. Miguel was faced with an armed uprising led by the ruler of another country (Brazil) and that his "Brazilian army" was mostly comprised of foreign mercenaries. A war which was only won after the Duque of Wellington fell from his leadership position in the British government which led to the the intervention of the Quadruple Alliance in Portugal: Basically an invasion of the country by the armies of Spain, France and the U.K.
D. Miguel was known as "The Traditionalist" up to the point the victorious liberals started to re-write history.