Talk:Aerated Bread Company

Ceased Operations: Citation

I have removed the FACT template from the article since the correctness of the statement is proven by facts on the ground. The only bakery still producing product was destroyed and in its place was built a large supermarket and housing development. A business cannot continue without its place of operations. Moreover, I have searched every accessible online news service in the U.K. and cannot find a single reference that one can use as a citation other than the destruction of the company's physical plant and its replacement by a Sainsbury Superstore and the Grand Union Walk Housing development. What I can find are citations that date the new buildings on the site to 1988. Is this acceptable? Thanks! SpikeToronto (talk) 22:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Also, the fact that the aerated bread process has been technologically superceded in the U.K. by the Chorleywood Bread Process also serves to prove the end of the era. No? SpikeToronto (talk) 02:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

'Anyone with a camera' passing near the Royal Courts of Justice - the fascia of the Tesco's opposite has 'Aerated Bread Company' as a 'ghost'/shadow in the stonework. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

That would be cool to see! :-) — SpikeToronto 08:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

This is identical with 232 Strand, mentioned in the article. See google street view: http://goo.gl/maps/oC1C3

And shown here and elsewhere. Jackiespeel (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

My feeling is that the whole article is too narrative for an encyclopedia, e.g. "Weston had the golden touch" and so on. I don't know enough about the topic and I am not a native speaker, thus maybe someone else may modify the text to sheer facts? --47.68.229.68 (talk) 07:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

ABC archives

Should [1] be mentioned in the article? Jackiespeel (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)