 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Longevity medicine (aging) was merged into Age management medicine with this edit on 11 April 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
New section
editI wrote about the differences between such terms as "age management" (which is a practical and theoretical framework and a set of approaches and methods) and other terms. It seems important since there have been a lot of developments and there is a need to differentiate between the terms. I've also added other definitions in the "See also" section for better understanding of the terms. Criticism section has been added and I also added categories "medical controversies", "future study" and "emerging technologies" This article is a stub and needs development and contributions from the other editors.--Suchexams (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article. Currently the first 3/4 of the article is a presentation of, argument for and promotion of the concept as would be told by a proponent. The is not to suggest that the article is biased because criticism is also covered and so I did not tag it for that. But would suggest development of more text that is not as described above. Happy editing!.
North8000 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Issues
editMost of the references 1) were not about the topic in question 2) were promotional 3) and some were predatory. Have trimmed a lot. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)