Talk:Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties

GAN

Issues:

• Lead: "The Asian Dynasties achieved gold status on September 28, 2007.[1] The demo version of the game was released on October 4, 2007,[7] while the full version was released in North America on October 23, 2007.[1] The game was generally received well by critics, with an 80% score on Game Rankings and Metacritic.[8][9] " – What is ‘gold status’ and why should anyone care? What makes the release of the demo so special (was there early reaction to it?) What were some general praise/complaints about the expansion? (Also funnels into development- you mention it was a partnership with Big Huge Games and Ensemble, that could certainly be mentioned in the lead.)
  • Done. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 02:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Going to suggest that you reorganize reception into aggregates, positive and negative sections instead of by reviewer like you have now, see Halo 3, et al.
  • Done. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 02:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• The entire changes section isn’t helpful for someone who’s never played the video game. I suggest a short introduction into the gameplay (in the lead as well) as well as a link to perhaps the parent Age of Empires III article section which describes it in more detail?
  • I'll try and make the Age of Empires III more prominent, but most "expansion" articles seem to have similar content. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 09:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

--Message me when you feel you’ve addressed my concerns. Cheers, David Fuchs ^(talk) 21:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks better, I'll pass. David Fuchs ^(talk) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Alert to editors, so it doesn't get a GAR.

There's a missing citation and a completely uncited section. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Picture

Great_Buddha_Wonder

^^^^What is up with this picture?, it must have been altered, (the pic is about halfway through the article) I own and regularly play the game and can say this picture is not typical of the game, there is something off about it- I just don't know what, If you play the game can you give your opinion please?
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 07:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

EDIT: Now I know what's wrong with it... It has the Japanese wonder under the control of the same person as the Chinese disiple! Can someone please replace this with a more realistic image? This one has obviously been staged using a mod or scenario editor (most likey and very possible in the standard scenario editor). And theres that fence thing near the shrine!
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 05:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

EDIT: OMG! How do I stop dashbot from removing this "non-free image" which is used in the article and so should be free?
Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 05:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

The image is not free and cannot be shown on this talk page. Non-free images can never be used on talk pages. A link can be provided to the image, however. —C.Fred (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

UPDATED PICTURE

Modes

Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 09:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't know the game, but if you say this is a more appropriate image, then that is fine. Images often get updated and changed as people find more appropriate ones. You don't need to discuss every change in an article before-hand. If someone disputes your change, that would be a time for a discussion - otherwise, it's find to go ahead and be WP:Bold.

As a tip for uploading images - find a similar image, and look at the documentation. That will help you complete the documentation on the image you upload. I have corrected the information on Modes. SilkTork *^YES! 13:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100818120054/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu:80/docs/history/primarydocs/War%20of%201857/Indian%20Mutiny--Ch1/letter%2031.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/docs/history/primarydocs/War%20of%201857/Indian%20Mutiny--Ch1/letter%2031.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Japanese campaign ending

I reworded the campaign like this. The last statement saying that he ran off was just wrong and WP:OR. The game at minimum leaves it open to interpretation, but I according to me, if anything, the game hinted the opposite...he chose to remain loyal despite knowing the truth. Either way, I erred on the side of caution and left it open. Also I found that this plot was either copied from or to the fandom site. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)