Talk:Agent Carter (film)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
 | Agent Carter (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agent Carter (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Agent Carter (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fan reception
editHi @Adamstom.97,
You've reverted one of my edits and reinstated the bit about fans liking Agent Carter. I'm more familiar with articles related to video game (see WP:VG); there, we consider user reception not notable, unless it is mentioned by reliable, independent third-party sources. I'm probably looking over it, but I can't spot the bit about fans liking it. Would you agree that it might need to be rephrased? A fan is someone who likes something, right? So this reads as "people who like Agent Carter, like Agent Carter. Maybe change it to viewers? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that is in reference to the first line of the reception section, which says the short was well received by the Comic Con audience. I feel that is more notable than usual given the smaller amount of reception to the short (not like one of the films, which have hundreds of critics responding to them). - adamstom97 (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hm, I see. I'm not convinced that it is important enough to be mentioned in the lead though. After all, the audience at that venue was probably rather small. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- The audience was during Comic-Con, which is admittedly a small portion of viewers, but still quite large. How about the sentence is rephrased as follows (or similarly): "The short was released on the home media release of Iron Man 3, and was received positively by critics and the audience from an earlier screening at Comic-Con." The goal is to have wording similar to that used in the reception section, because Comic-Con audiences are not all fans, as media is also generally in attendance. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hm, I see. I'm not convinced that it is important enough to be mentioned in the lead though. After all, the audience at that venue was probably rather small. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Adamstom.97 and Favre1fan93, I just came across this discussion again, sorry about that. How do you feel, adamstom97, about Favre1fan93's proposal? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think I would be fine with that. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Added - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think I would be fine with that. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
