Talk:Akshardham Temple attack
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
editArticles Akshardham temple Siege and Akshardham temple atack sems to describe the same incident. I believe they should be merged into just one. I suggest to copy info form Siege into Atack, and make it a Redirect. --Abu Badali 16:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Merge, per nomination. --Abu Badali 16:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
I did it. I'd appreciate a fact check, since the siege page listed "2 terrorists" and the attack page "3 gunmen." I stuck with 3 for now. Brighterorange 18:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
It is actually two. I will fix it Juthani1 tcs 20:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Suggested Edits
editAt present, the article provides a limited and cursory overview of the Akshardham Temple attack. The article itself contains a few citations and does not offer a chronological timeline of events. Therefore, I propose an overhaul of this article which takes into account the aforementioned limitations. Pshamb (talk) 03:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
It would be helpful if some editor would like to take on checking names throughout the article. I have spent so much time just on common proofreading issues, plus formatting and consistency, that I don't want to go back over the article any further; but I've noticed that at times, only a surname was given, or initials were used without knowing for sure whether the person referred to prefers to omit them or not. Then too, the article often gives both a first and last name after a person is referred to the first time, which should not be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Augnablik (talk • contribs) 08:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)