Talk:Alaska marmot

Photo

Nothing on Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

File:S-GROUNDHOG-large.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion: File:S-GROUNDHOG-large.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status File:Marmota Broweri.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alaska marmot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205172035/http://newsminer.com/view/full_story/5722944/article-Alaska-to-celebrate-its-first-Marmot-Day- to http://www.newsminer.com/view/full_story/5722944/article-Alaska-to-celebrate-its-first-Marmot-Day-

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alaska marmot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) 13:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

I'll pick this one up. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Refs:
  • "The conflicting data pertaining to phylogeny creates inconsistent marmot lineage relationship hypotheses." needs a ref
    • Just removed since it didn't seem particularly important.
  • "Especially in large colonies, the Alaska marmots utilize sentry duty rolls that are periodically rotated." needs a ref
    • Done.
  • Current ref 11 ""Alaska Marmot (Marmota broweri)". Archived from the original on 28 December 2021. Retrieved 29 January 2022." lacks a publisher
    • Done.
• Lead:
  • There should be a bit more in this lead - it should summarize the entire article - right now it just covers location, what they eat, their size, and the bit about the government making them have a holiday.
    • Done.
• Evolution:
  • "The Alaska marmot has ancestry to the Pleistocene epoch" - awkward - suggest "The Alaska marmot's ancestry traces to the Pleistocene epoch."
    • Done.
  • "There have been no known fossils of Marmota broweri." awkward - suggest "There are no known fossils of Marmota broweri."
    • Done.
  • "However, the M. flavescens fossil recovered from the Late Pleistocene age from the Trail creeks caves on the Seward Peninsula[12] is speculated to be an incorrect identification of the fossil[5] This fossil could be M. broweri." Several issues here. There either needs to be a period after "of the fossil." or we need to integrate the "This fossils could be.." phrase. Suggest "incorrect identification which could be M. broweri."
    • Done.
  • "In addition, somatic chromosome analysis of marmots, ecological data and behavioral data have shown that there is a link" clunky - suggest "In addition, somatic chromosome analysis, ecological data, and behavioral data have shown that there is a link"
    • Done.
  • "Current distribution of the Alaska marmot include the Brooks Range, Ray Mountains, and Kokrines Hills.[15] They exist in the mountains that lie north of the Yukon and Porcupine rivers in central and northern Alaska." Clunky - suggest "Alaska marmots inhabit the mountains that lie north of the Yukon and Porcupine rivers in central and northern Alaska - including the Brooks Range, Ray Mountains, and Kokrines Hills."
    • Done.
  • "each consisting of various families." do you mean "several families"?
    • Done.
• Habitat:
  • "pelage fur" link? And this sentence would work better in description
    • This was a mistake, which I have fixed.
• Anatomical distinctions:
  • link "retina" and "rods"
    • Done.
  • link "fovea"
    • Done.
• Hibernation:
  • "They then resettle in their dens in family units to communally hibernate for the winter." but if the last chronological mention is for May so ... the "then resettle" makes no sense as this would be summer ...
    • Fixed.
  • "In order to seal their hibernaculum off from the elements, they will plug their entrance with hay, earth, and stone." this has already been mention, redundant here or there... pick one spot and only mention it once
  • *Done.
  • did you mean to say something like "During hibernation many of their body functions decrease such as body temperature (averages between 4.5 °C (40.1 °F) and 7.5 °C (45.5 °F)), heart rates, respiratory rates."?

Done.

• Reproduction:
  • "viviparous" link

Done.

• Relationship with humans:
  • "An Eskimo hunter would spend all summer hunting marmots to make a parka, as it takes about 20 marmot pelts to make a single parka." suggest rewording to "Native hunters require at least 20 pelts to make a single parka, making it time consuming to hunt them for larger garments."
    • Done.
• I randomly googled three phrases and only turned up Wikipedia mirrors. Earwig's tool shows no sign of copyright violation.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

I think I've gotten everything. --An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Looks good, passing now. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that an Alaska marmot's pelt is worth over 60 USD? Source: https://animaldiversity.org/site/accounts/information/Marmota_broweri.html (statistic from 1956), https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm (adjustment for inflation)
  • ALT1: ... that Alaska marmots take turns acting as sentries to protect their colonies? Source: https://animaldiversity.org/site/accounts/information/Marmota_broweri.html
  • ALT2: ... that an Alaska marmot's body temperature can drop as low as 4.5 °C (40.1 °F) during hibernation? Source: https://doi.org/10.1080%2F08927014.2009.9522495
  • Comment: No QPQ needed.

Improved to Good Article status by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk). Self-nominated at 21:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC).

• Hi An anonymous username, not my real name, review follows: article promoted to GA on 2 March; exceeds minimum length and is well written; not an expert in this area but sources look to be reliable; a random check on some of the sources found no overly close paraphrasing; I don't think you can use ALT0, adjusting a price from 1956 for inflation doesn't mean that is what the pelt is worth today; ALT1 and ALT2 are mentioned in the article and check out to the sources cited; nominator is QPQ exempt - Dumelow (talk) 08:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

ALT1 to T:DYK/P2

Misquoting

"Cytochrome b sequences were used to verify M. broweri as a distinct species.[8]"

8. Rausch, R. L.; V.R. Rausch (March 1971). "The somatic chromosomes of some North American marmots (Sciuridae), with remarks on the relationships of Marmota broweri Hall and Gilmore". Mammalia. 35: 85–101. doi:10.1515/mamm.1971.35.1.85. S2CID 85371571. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2011.

Robert L. Rausch and Virginia R. Rausch could not write anything about DNA sequencing and cytochrome b in 1971, since these methods did not yet exist. Hunu (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)