Talk:Alberta New Democratic Party/Archive 1

Archive 1

Election results

The election results section seems to be falsely claiming that the NDP became the Official Opposition in most elections. This appears to be a mistake. To take one single election, for example, the Wildrose were the Official Opposition after the 2012 election. I may be misinterpreting the table, though. --Yamla (talk) 19:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Yamla (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Someone reverted those changes without any explanation. While their change may be correct, I suspect vandalism given the lack of the edit summary or any discussion here. As such, I reverted back. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alberta New Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119045248/http://www.abheritage.ca/abpolitics/events/party_nd.html to http://www.abheritage.ca/abpolitics/events/party_nd.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706184337/http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/viewPDFInterstitial/2472/2875 to http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/viewPDFInterstitial/2472/2875

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Major re-write required

This stub article, as it stands, contains several major inaccuracies about the history of the party and its current and historic big tent status.

A major re-write is required, and I plan to begin doing so this weekend. Other interested editors may want to watch and learn. There are few things more annoying to me than seeing people write history who know next to nothing about it.

Garth of the Forest (talk) 00:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Cool, so long as your rewrite is reliably sourced. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Planning to make stark changes to this page

As it is, the page is almost unreadable. It took me a while to figure out what this group's philosophy was. I think a lot of the issues of the page could be addressed with some decisive edits. Rajvansh Upadhyay (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

You appear to be a new editor. No problem, but please make sure you familiarise yourself with WP:5P before you kick off a major rewrite. In particular, WP:CITE and WP:RS, along with WP:NPOV, are going to be absolutely critical to your success. These are tricky policies, even for well-established editors. You are, of course, welcome to make changes. If you find yourself getting reverted, please stop, take a step back, and come here to establish consensus for your changes. You might not be able to do that, in which case you should refrain from reintroducing your content. Editing Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. I hope your earlier comment here no longer reflects your approach to editing. --Yamla (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)