Talk:Alexey Pivovarov
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — RussianLiberal (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- The editor appears to be in the process of constructing the article, so I'd suggest allowing a little time for that - in fact, I think I'll add a "hasty" tag -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- The hasty tag says "10 minutes", but please give the editor more time than that, as I don't think he is a native English speaker -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
See WP:CREATIVE for guidelines on notability of journalists. Nobody Ent 12:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- OK, 5 films and every day arrearence in federal news makes him notable even if some wikifreak thinks that it is not--RussianLiberal (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Listen, just stop being abusive and calling people things like "Wikifreak", or you might find yourself blocked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- What about users using the term in edit summaries? [1] Nobody Ent 13:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I suspect that was meant as humour - but it did seem a bit pointed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- What about users using the term in edit summaries? [1] Nobody Ent 13:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Listen, just stop being abusive and calling people things like "Wikifreak", or you might find yourself blocked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with Boing, calling other editors wikifreaks just because they have different opinion is inappropriate. On the other hand, from what I've found in the news archives Pivovarov seems to be a notable journalist and an important exponent of the 2011 Russian anti-government protests. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you!!--RussianLiberal (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm leaning towards thinking he's sufficiently notable too. But I wouldn't remove the notability tag just yet, as there's no harm giving it time for more people to have a look. The worst that will happen is that someone will take it to AfD (which anyone can do anyway, even without that tag), and we'd all get to have our say there - it's certainly not going to be summarily deleted now -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- BBC and Reuters call Pivovarov "a leading Russian TV presenter" and "a hard core NTV veteran", which is in my opinion a good and persuasive evidence of notability. Not to mention the Russian coverage provided in the G-news search linked above. This is a clear case, the article has potential, at least in my opinion. No problem with the tag, I've learned to ignore most of that stuff. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm leaning towards thinking he's sufficiently notable too. But I wouldn't remove the notability tag just yet, as there's no harm giving it time for more people to have a look. The worst that will happen is that someone will take it to AfD (which anyone can do anyway, even without that tag), and we'd all get to have our say there - it's certainly not going to be summarily deleted now -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- I've removed the notability tag - as the evening news reader for a major Russion television channel, he'd probably pass WP:GNG anyway, but the incident reported by Reuters -- where he reportedly refused yo read the news unless he could report on the ongoing protests -- really pushes him over the bar. For those who disagree, AfD is available. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your excellent improvements, Beyond My Ken. It is now a good and comprehensible piece of information on journalism in Russia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 22:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, same from me - I agree, and thanks for your work -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Glad to help out! Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, same from me - I agree, and thanks for your work -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your excellent improvements, Beyond My Ken. It is now a good and comprehensible piece of information on journalism in Russia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 22:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Pivovarov1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Pivovarov1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alexey Pivovarov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914060537/http://protelik.ru:80/2007/01/30/aleksejj-pivovarov-karera-ljubov-nakazanie/ to http://protelik.ru/2007/01/30/aleksejj-pivovarov-karera-ljubov-nakazanie/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)