Talk:Alice in Wonderland (1976 film)

Significance

I understand that this film is considered one of the classics of the genre, with unusually high production values. I believe it may have also been the last noteworthy cinematic porn effort, before the advent of filming everything on videotape. Videotape was a technology that allowed production companies to produce more volume at less cost. The quality of the genre has suffered ever since because expensive film isn't being shot anymore, removing some incentive to create quality productions.

Although I can't verify anything in the paragraph I wrote above, I have seen consensus on these points elsewhere. The film Boogie Nights, for example, illustrates the degradation of quality in the porn film industry when videotape became prevalent. If anything I wrote is verifiable, then something about the significance of this X-rated Alice in Wonderland should be mentioned in the article. Amatulic 23:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Release ratings

Wasn't the original film released as an explicit and also a hard-R version? The entry indicated it was cut to R when the VHS version came out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:21BB:29C9:941C:514B (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alice in Wonderland (1976 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071120034444/http://www.subversivecinema.com/ to http://www.subversivecinema.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)