This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
edit1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals.
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.
12) I do not think you can consider this film to be a high water mark for Todd Bridges or Lou Diamond Phillips or a notable addition to their film resumes.
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)