Talk:Aliyu Salisu Barau
Latest comment: 2 months ago by EMsmile in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. Has the issues for which it was previously tagged. Happy editing.
North8000 (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi User:North8000, I came here via the Earth System Governance Project which is linked from here. I am curious what you think of this article and the process. My question is: this article has way too much content in the "career" section, and in general loads of statements that are not sourced. I would recommended deleting all the non-sourced content.
- Also another question to you and the page creator User:Abubakar Tanimu Salisu. Given the similarities in name (coincidence?), I would like to know more about the potential WP:COI and how it's handled. On their user page they have a box to say "declared COI" but aren't they meant to provide more details? What does the COI exist of and how is it managed? I am not trying to be mean, just getting my head around for how I would do it correctly and in a bullet-proof way if I was setting up a BLP and I had a professional connection to that person (Frank Biermann in my case). EMsmile (talk) 08:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @EMsmile: To fully answer your good questions would take me a book rather than a post. So I'll just make a few notes and and offer to help on anything specific. My NPP review was imited to "should a separate article on the topic exist?" vs. taking it to AFD if I think not. Regarding the article, my biggest thought is that it reads like a resume rather than an enclyclopedia article. The best solution would be to find and include some sources that cover him in depth and develop substantial content from those. Regarding wp:COI, that's the part that would take a book and I've written much on it, and think that policy is to ham-handed on this. Regarding Frank Biermann, my advice/opinion (with you being an experienced editor) is to approach it with ONLY your Wikipedia editor hat on and to do everything accordingly, starting with deciding if a separate article on him should exist. And if so, start developing the article. I'm happy to further advise or help make things official if you wish; if so please ping me. North8000 (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I'll reach out to you separately by pinging you about my questions on the Frank Biermann article. But regarding this article, did the Wikipedian User:Abubakar Tanimu Salisu apply the guidelines correctly regarding COI? That is, is it enough to put that COI box on one's user page? I thought one would have to explain what exactly the COI is and how it's managed. I've read through some of the guidelines regarding BLPs and autobiographies but am still a bit confused on how to do it correctly. It seems to me that the approach by User:Abubakar Tanimu Salisu was not correct though. Am I wrong? EMsmile (talk) 13:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- @EMsmile: To fully answer your good questions would take me a book rather than a post. So I'll just make a few notes and and offer to help on anything specific. My NPP review was imited to "should a separate article on the topic exist?" vs. taking it to AFD if I think not. Regarding the article, my biggest thought is that it reads like a resume rather than an enclyclopedia article. The best solution would be to find and include some sources that cover him in depth and develop substantial content from those. Regarding wp:COI, that's the part that would take a book and I've written much on it, and think that policy is to ham-handed on this. Regarding Frank Biermann, my advice/opinion (with you being an experienced editor) is to approach it with ONLY your Wikipedia editor hat on and to do everything accordingly, starting with deciding if a separate article on him should exist. And if so, start developing the article. I'm happy to further advise or help make things official if you wish; if so please ping me. North8000 (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)