Talk:All-Channel Receiver Act

Untitled

This article si hopelessly inaccurate. There are several stand alone digital STBs and the article calims tehre are none.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All-Channel Receiver Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090305232419/http://www.current.org/pbpb/legislation/ETVProgressRept1965.html to http://www.current.org/pbpb/legislation/ETVProgressRept1965.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All-Channel Receiver Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081204165323/http://broadcastengineering.com/newsrooms/community_broadcasters_association_petitions_0328/ to http://broadcastengineering.com/newsrooms/community_broadcasters_association_petitions_0328

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All-Channel Receiver Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724082750/http://tvtechnology.com/pages/s.0157/t.13436.html to http://www.tvtechnology.com/pages/s.0157/t.13436.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

The applicability of the All-Channel Receiver Act to the expanded AM broadcast band (1605~1705 kHz)

Unless a specific citation can be made to the FCC Record, I do feel that the mention that the application of the All-Channel Receiver Act was not used to mandate the FCC in the 1980s to mandate that new AM radios manufactured mandating tuning in the 1605~1705 kHz band.

I have already reviewed the original Expanded Band R&O (6 FCC Rcd 6273, 6337) and at para. 202, the FCC acknowledges comments were received suggesting mandatory standards pointing to "earlier Commission actions in regard to the UHF television band" however, there is no cite to the Act in this section. It can be concluded that no requirement was in the original R&O.

There was no mention of it in the NPRM (5 FCC Rcd 4381-4481). Receiver standards discussed in paras. 96~99 discussing the NRSC-2 emission model.

No mention of it in the MO&O (8 FCC Rcd 3250) or in any subsequent orders on reconsideration (most of those were related to issues involving the assignment of migrating stations and frequencies).

Keep in mind though that I do not have a subscription legal database (i.e. Lexis) so I can't find anything within docket 87-267 related to receiver standards that mandate expanded band tuning citing the All-Channel Receiver Act. Unless this was addressed in a different proceeding, we could conclude that the All-Channel Act was NOT invoked but only suggested by commenters and that the Wikipedia article is inaccurate. Again, this may have been addressed on a different docket but based on my limited abilities to search past proceedings that do not require expensive subscriptions, I could not find any documents that cite the original R&O (6 FCC Rcd 6273).

Again, unless someone can cite a specific Order from the FCC Record, I move to have this information removed as inaccurate. Recnet (talk) 16:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC) recnet

References