Talk:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ronz in topic Controversy regarding its Director

Non-free file problems with File:All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Logo).jpg

edit

  File:All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Logo).jpg is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Logo).jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Controversy regarding its Director

edit

The Director of AIIMS was sacked in 2006, after a controversy resulting in a case before the Delhi High Court. This happened as a result of a resolution which was passed by the 17 member governing body of the institute. Many people have touted this to be an extension of the Ramadoss (The Union Health Minister & The President of AIIMS) and P Venugopal rivalry. On 8 May 2008, Venugopal was re-instated as AIIMS director by a Supreme Court judgement.

I moved the above here as it has no sourcing, violating WP:BLP, and it smacks of scandal mongering in violation o WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Ronz (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply