Talk:All the Money in the World

Chase or Chace

Is mark wahlberg's character Fletcher "Chase" or Fletcher "Chace" Daiyusha (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I have the DVD on my TV right now. "Chace" in the credits. Mattman944 (talk) 09:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Dame Judi Dench's criticism of decision to remove Kevin Spacey's performance

As part of the section entitled 'Recasting of J. Paul Getty', I suggest that the following information below be include. Since this content was added to the page, editors have debated whether this contribute is relevant to the article. I want provide an opportunity for people to express their opinions in order to determine whether or not material should be included:

In September 2018, Dame Judi Dench criticised the decision to remove her "good friend" Kevin Spacey's performance from the film. Dench was reported to have said "I can't approve, in any way, of the fact - whatever he has done - that you then start to cut him out of films". Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-45649671 Jono1011 (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I can't see any reason to not include that relevant comment on the change of cast. Dicklyon (talk) 04:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree, I think this addition stands as a good examples of Relevance Level B, as discussed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance The quote has been sourced from a reliable, published sources and clearly relates to the sub-section Jono1011 (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Box office

Regardless of any accolades, the film must be listed as a "box office bomb." 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Says who? Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:All the Money in the World/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DoubleGrazing (talk · contribs) 09:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Starting the GA review, expect to complete initial stage within 48 hrs. On a quick read, looking pretty good, IMO. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Text is easy to understand, flows well, and is structured in a logical and coherent manner, with correct spelling and grammar.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Referencing is appropriate in both quantity and quality, to reliable industry sources and multiple mainstream RS media outlets. I've found nothing to suggest copyvio, OR or other such issues.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers all key areas one would expect to find in a well-developed article on a major film.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   A potential minefield, namely the problem related to Spacey, is handled in an objective and neutral manner. The 'Release' section is factual and backed up throughout by references to external reviews, with no sign of POV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Plenty of the usual ebb and flow including multiple reverts, but nothing out of the ordinary, and nothing that comes across as edit warring.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Could do with a few more images, but the ones that are there, are appropriate with no obvious issues.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good article in all respects. Having read it twice now, I found nothing to criticise or even any areas of major development needed. Happy to endorse this nom.

Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

"Giuseppe Bonifati" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Giuseppe Bonifati has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 27 § Giuseppe Bonifati until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)