Talk:Alluc
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alluc article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days ![]() |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Untitled section
edithttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/business/yourmoney/01frenzy.html?_r=3&ref=technology&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin does being mentioned in the newyorktimes mean that alluc.org is notable enough?
- No. See WP:WEB for details. --J2thawiki 15:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
why speedy delete it now? it has enough references to different newspapers... and sorry I didn't know that you couldn't remove speedydeletion thingy --Iyenweyel 4 april 2007
Legal for US End Users?
editSomebody needs to start a section and get research going on the legality of end users viewing the streaming video of copyrighted works under United States Federal Law. We know that the Defendant's Intention is irrelevant, thus an Innocent Mistake or unknowingly downloading infringing content is not a defense. However, the question is whether viewing Streaming constitutes "copying" given there's never a full copy of the file on your system. The other question is whether the end user is liable for Contributory Infringement by enabling the poster's copying of the file to you. But then, if you're not recieiving a copy, then he's not sending a copy. So does anyone have any legal research on this, or at least a link to another successful suit by the MPAA against a streaming site FOR STREAMING (rather than for Having/Displaying-in-Public full versions of copyrighted works)?
Cyberbot II has detected links on Alluc which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- https://www.alluc.to/
- Triggered by
\balluc\.(?:to|com)\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected links on Alluc which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- https://www.alluc.to/
- Triggered by
\balluc\.(?:to|com)\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected links on Alluc which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- https://www.alluc.to/
- Triggered by
\balluc\.(?:to|com)\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Alluc page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Alluc" page.