Almirante Latorre-class battleship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Does
The two 6-inch guns located farthest aft were removed in 1916, as they were affected by blast damage from the amidships 14-inch turret
refer to the last such guns (if means the second-last, my english is poor: tell me this and ignore what follows)? The text of the Latorre entry suggests the second-last an the drawing strongly supports this conclusion because the last are shielded by the structure. pietro.
151.15.212.218 (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello Pietro! It was the farthest aft guns that were removed. You can see in the diagram that there are a pair of 6-inch guns even farther back, pointing aft, than the ones protected by the super structure. :-) Ed[talk][majestic titan]04:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply