This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Talk:Altiplano–Puna volcanic complex is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine Geography. If you would like to participate, you can improve Altiplano–Puna volcanic complex, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bolivia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all Bolivia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoliviaWikipedia:WikiProject BoliviaTemplate:WikiProject BoliviaBolivia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
A fact from Altiplano–Puna volcanic complex appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 September 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The phrase Accelerated rifting at the East Pacific Rise about 12-10 mya resulted in more rapid subduction and higher melt generation is somewhat contradictory as it is not "rifting" that drives subduction (rather scientists suggests its the other way round). Also the word "rifting" (increasing rifting) is not the usual way to refer to refer to to what happens at well-developed divergent boundaries. I suggest to use the word "divergence" (increasing divergence). —Lappspira (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Furthermore, at this time extremely rapid spreading at the present-day East Pacific Rise (Larson and Pitman, 1972) resulted in a faster rate of subduction at the Andean margin (Pardo-Casas arid Molnar, 1987), which in turn may have resulted ¡ n increased heat input (intrusion of mafic magmas) to the crust.
So apparently the source got it wrong. No sure if it is the authors faulty reasoning or if in 1989 subduction mechanisms were not well understood. I suggest finding a more recent source for the subduction tectonics. Lappspira (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hum. Apparently, according to older and more recent research the main thing that happened there was a steepening of the subduction. I also found some fairly contradictory data on the subduction speed. I've put in this information on the steepening. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
