Talk:Amanda Peet

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Jbartelt9 in topic Early roles - no source and incorrect

the photo...

edit

haha... wow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.140.205 (talk) 04:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

WP:BLP concerns

edit

Regarding this edit,[1] when it comes to biographical material about living persons, Wikipedia tends to be conservative. We don't post sensitive, personal or contentious material about a living person without strong sourcing. (See reliable sources for Wikipedia's guidelines about sourcing.) Even then, we have to weigh this information as compared to all the information regarding this person, and if we decide to include this information, we should do so in an encyclopedic manner. I'm sorry, but saying that sources exist, but you can't find any, so you're adding a 'citation needed' tag, is not sufficient. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Amanda Peet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Physicist

edit

You should have an article for U Toronto physicist Amanda Peet, or at least mention her on a disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is she notable? Can you prove that she's notable? Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Chaheel Riens: You can see how frequently she is cited by searching "Amanda W. Peet" in Google Books or do the same search on Google Scholars to see the numerous peer-reviewed articles she's authored. Or you could check out the Nova presentation: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/view-peet.html. I don't know if that constitutes "proof" for Wikipurposes. Likely cutting edge theoretical physicists have a heavier burden than the countless garage bands, sitcom episodes and video games that have articles in Wikipedia. AnthroMimus (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Peet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quaker?

edit

Why is Peet listed in the American Quakers category? I don't see any reference supporting that she's Quaker, only that her father is, and that she attended a Quaker school. -Amcbride (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removed. --Amcbride (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Early roles - no source and incorrect

edit

"Peet's first screen performances were in a television commercial for Skittles and an uncredited appearance as the girlfriend of the titular character in the second episode of The Larry Sanders Show in 1992." I just watched this episode, and Larry Sanders' wife is played by Megan Gallagher (listed in the credits and IMDB). There is no "girlfriend" and no Amanda Peet. Jbartelt9 (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply