Talk:American Arts Commemorative Series medallions

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:American Arts Commemorative Series medallions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found, denticle and unlinked as I think neither Dermal denticle nor Pulp stone are meant here. Is this in fact the correct word? Jezhotwells (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The medallions were initially sold through mail order by obtaining that day's price by telephone Rather clumsy, can this be re-phrased?

   Beginning in 1982, denticles, reeding and a statement of gold content and national origin were added to the medallions. As noted above in the disambiguations section, denticles needs explanation as there is no suitable Wikipedia target. Suggest a suitable paraphrase of this source.

   Otherwise prose is fine, the lead is short but I believe that it adequately summarises the article.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References are RS, and those that are on-line support the statements, assume good faith for others, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers the subject in sufficent detail, no unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for these issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

   Ok, this is good to go, so I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the review! I've fixed the problems you noted above. Rewording the mail order part was a little trickly, but I think it reads a lot better now. Thanks again!-RHM22 (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on American Arts Commemorative Series medallions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009215324/http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr548.pdf to http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr548.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009214957/http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr522.pdf to http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr522.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009215244/http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr544.pdf to http://www.usmint.gov/historianscorner/?action=DocDL&doc=pr544.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Width issue

Is there a way to reduce the width of the images in the "Designs and sales figures" so content does not extend beyond the width of my screen? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)