Talk:American Pie Presents: Beta House

Latest comment: 10 years ago by FilmTVComicsNerd in topic GA Review
Good articleAmerican Pie Presents: Beta House has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 31, 2013Good article nomineeListed
July 16, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
January 12, 2017Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Current status: Good article

References

edit


The below are unreliable sources. Do NOT add them to the article. Thanks! Alex Douglas (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


This is the reference list

  1. ^ Cornelius, David (28 December 2007). "Movie Review - American Pie Presents Beta House". eFilmCritic. Retrieved 3 November 2011. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  2. ^ Nusair, David (17 December 2007). "American Pie Presents Beta House - The American Pie Series Reviews". Reel Film Reviews. Retrieved 3 November 2011. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ David Lee, William (24 December 2007). "American Pie Presents: Beta House". DVD Town. Retrieved 24 August 2008. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  4. ^ a b http://www.hometheaterinfo.com/american_pie_presents_beta_house.htm
  5. ^ http://bradfordanderson.net/2007_12_23_archive.html
  6. ^ http://afterthepower.blogspot.com/2007/12/chris-violette-in-american-pie-presents.html
  7. ^ Weeks, Adam. "New American Pie sequel announced". Moviehole. Archived from the original on 9 April 2007.

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:American Pie Presents: Beta House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 20:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This has been sitting in the queue for a while, so I'll handle it. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "seven [to] eight weeks" - Why does this need to be quoted? You can just rephrase it yourself.
  • "While largely overlooked by critics" This appears to be WP:OR - there aren't any sources saying this.
  • "he hasn't ejaculated for a few months" - "discovering he'd had sex" - Watch for MOS:N'T
  • "on aspects of writer Lindsay's own life" We can drop the "writer" here; we know he wrote the movie already.
  • "It was rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America, due to "pervasive strong crude and sexual content, graphic nudity, language and excessive drinking," per WP:FILMRATING you should remove this.
  • "However, not all reviews were negative. IGN's Hock Teh gave the film 5/10" That doesn't exactly sound positive.

I place this on hold. It's short, but covers what is known about the film. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 21:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reviewing the article. I have made the suggested edits. FilmTVComicsNerd (talk) 10:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply