Talk:Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
edit1) A cursory internet search only returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals.
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 17:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have nominated the article for discussion of notability and possible deletion. The discussion can be found here. --Ebyabe (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060509155937/http://www.moria.co.nz:80/horror/ancientevil.htm to http://www.moria.co.nz/horror/ancientevil.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040902142143/http://www.epinions.com:80/content_62029336196 to http://www.epinions.com/content_62029336196
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 12 October 2016 (UTC)