This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Is interpressnews a neutral/good source? It's used for nearly all the sources in that section. Ideally some other (neutral) news outlets should be used, where possible. Thanks. LugnutsFire Walk with Me18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Well, it is the best possible source in English language. It is a news agency like Reuters, and usually is quite accurate. Also, the facts sourced by interpressnews are merely just facts and I don't think they might have any interest to corrupt facts. There is also BBC news report, but interpressnews was more uptime.--Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Liberal media and politicians try to put label of pro-russian on the protesting groups. The fact there are sources saying these groups are pro-russian doesn't mean they are pro-russian indeed, considering that leaders of these groups say they are against Russian policies. You can mention in the article that some people refer to the protesters as pro-russian, but right now article breaks WP:NPOV rule and needs edit. —ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
You might have been right, but your reading of WP:NPOV is totally wrong: look at the rule more accurately, there is an entire part WP:WEIGHT. Hundred of internationally recognized sources (Reuters for examples), NGO reports, Georgian outlets highlight connections with Russian authorities and their pro-russian views. In case of Lortkipanidze, he is the head of a Yevgeny Primakov Foundation based in Russia, funded by Russia and named after a KGB spy. In this case your argument about neutrality simply doesn't apply, just as the argument of "flat earth" doesn't apply to Earth article. --Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply