Talk:Andrićgrad
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrićgrad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serbian?
editIn the sentence "Town is dedicated to the Serbian Ivo Andrić, Nobel price winner." please change "the Serbian" part to Yugoslav or Croat. It is extremely POV. Just because he lived in Belgrade doesn't mean he was Serbian. 77.77.252.60 (talk) 13:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Bosnian Serb ?
editAs the page about Ivo Andric says,he was Bosnian CROAT,and not a bosnian serb... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.252.235.101 (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Language
editCurrent state of the article, as edited by user DemirBajraktarevic is wrong. Андрићград is not Bosnian nor Croatian, but Serbian. Andrićgrad is Bosnian and Croatian and Serbian, while Андрићград is ONLY Serbian. Also, and therefor, i am for removing unrelated Croatian, as that region have nothing to do with Croatian language. Also, Serbian have priority, as this is the region of ONLY Serbian, despite being geographically in Bosnia. But it is in the Republica Srpska entity, so therefor, Serbian per population, region, entity and major language, while Bosnian is obsolete, as bosnian is THE SAME as article title, Andrićgrad. Per wiki guidelines, we should use ALTENATIVNAMES only if they are different then original article title. --WhiteWriterspeaks 12:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- One more thing. It is region of Bosnia, but language is Serbian. Fact. --WhiteWriterspeaks 12:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Well you changing the language to "English" isn't factual. The 3 official languages in Bosnia are BOSNIAN, Croatian and Serbian (sadly). I think we should just put "Cyrillic" as this covers all three OFFICIAL languages, and not just one.--DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sadly? Serbian, sadly? I think that our conversation is almost over with this. Anyway, why should we cover all three languages? Two are not used in Andrićgrad. Also, cyrilics are not covering of all three, but insuficiant data. Are you doing this only to remove word Serbian from article lede? --WhiteWriterspeaks 20:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- DemirBajraktarevic, an obvious POV-warrior, has already been warned on this topic (changing Serbian Cyrillic to Cyrillic). This will be addressed at the Admin noticeboard once I have time.--Zoupan 04:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- The only thing that's sad, Demir, is that you deny the right of Serbian Cyrillic to exist in Bosnia (even though no other ethnicity uses it other than Serbs). You and I have already had this dicussion over Trebinje. Just my 2 cents. 23 editor (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Andrićgrad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.vecernjenovosti.info/vesti/kultura.71.html:313705-Uz-cupriju-novi-Kusturicin-grad - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118070734/http://kamengrad.info:80/ to http://kamengrad.info/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915091511/http://www.visegradturizam.com:80/openfile.php?dir=9_76_sr&page=1_77_sr.txt to http://www.visegradturizam.com/openfile.php?dir=9_76_sr&page=1_77_sr.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)