This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angel in the Night article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on 3 June 2022.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
im going to fix this now, but i will put here what it previously said and explain why i changed it
this one part bugs me because a)part of it is incorrect, and b)another part is totally irrelavent and uneeded(i know, spelling errors, its late)
it previously said "drag race but in Need For Speed it is call Street X"
for change A, i will change "drag race" to "drift race" as that is what it is. drag is totally different.
for change B, i will remove the "but in Need For Speed it is call Street X" as i see NO relavence to it!
Willgame4food (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Was ineligible at the time of the nomination. No prejudice against a renomination if the article is brought to GA status.
Hi Eurohunter, this isn't turning up as a 5x expansion in readable prose size and isn't eligible on recency for that reason. It now has 3174 characters and it had 1636 on May 5. I might suggest that, if this nomination had continued, I would have worried about the hook—is it notable for a single to be certified 14 years after release in this genre? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
(I should have meant unusual or attention-worthy last time, not notable...oops!) WP:DYKCHECK is what we use to calculate readable prose size. I also wanted to flag, Eurohunter, that since you already have had six nominations, each of your three pending DYK nominations requires a QPQ (a review of another page) to be considered. (This was changed to per nomination, not per article approved, which is notable for you since you've had 3 DYKs approved and 3 rejected.) So, not counting this page (that can't go forward), you will need at least a QPQ for Fest i hela huset. You might want to ask at WT:DYK if you need one for Life Speaks to Me, but given the backlog we have, I strongly recommend it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply