Template:Did you know nominations/Angel in the Night
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Was ineligible at the time of the nomination. No prejudice against a renomination if the article is brought to GA status.
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Angel in the Night
- ... that "Angel in the Night" in 2022 was certified Silver for sales of 200,000 copies in the United Kingdom? Source: https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/18021-2716-1
5x expanded by Eurohunter (talk). Self-nominated at 14:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC).
Hi Eurohunter, this isn't turning up as a 5x expansion in readable prose size and isn't eligible on recency for that reason. It now has 3174 characters and it had 1636 on May 5. I might suggest that, if this nomination had continued, I would have worried about the hook—is it notable for a single to be certified 14 years after release in this genre? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: How I can count that? Certification is always notable in any music genre. I will think on other proposals. Eurohunter (talk) 07:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- (I should have meant unusual or attention-worthy last time, not notable...oops!) WP:DYKCHECK is what we use to calculate readable prose size. I also wanted to flag, Eurohunter, that since you already have had six nominations, each of your three pending DYK nominations requires a QPQ (a review of another page) to be considered. (This was changed to per nomination, not per article approved, which is notable for you since you've had 3 DYKs approved and 3 rejected.) So, not counting this page (that can't go forward), you will need at least a QPQ for Fest i hela huset. You might want to ask at WT:DYK if you need one for Life Speaks to Me, but given the backlog we have, I strongly recommend it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Good to know so I will try to review something what is familiar to me (Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide). Eurohunter (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have added QPQ for Fest i hela huset. Eurohunter (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Good to know so I will try to review something what is familiar to me (Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide). Eurohunter (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- (I should have meant unusual or attention-worthy last time, not notable...oops!) WP:DYKCHECK is what we use to calculate readable prose size. I also wanted to flag, Eurohunter, that since you already have had six nominations, each of your three pending DYK nominations requires a QPQ (a review of another page) to be considered. (This was changed to per nomination, not per article approved, which is notable for you since you've had 3 DYKs approved and 3 rejected.) So, not counting this page (that can't go forward), you will need at least a QPQ for Fest i hela huset. You might want to ask at WT:DYK if you need one for Life Speaks to Me, but given the backlog we have, I strongly recommend it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)