Talk:Angie Bolen

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Goojrr in topic Absences
Good articleAngie Bolen has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2009Articles for deletionKept
January 29, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
June 1, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

untitled

edit

I don't think the article should be deleted because I like the character Angie Bolen so much. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

You haven't seen the character yet! -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

This article should be merged, now that she is no longer and regualr character.. it can be shortened to make sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.236.160 (talk) 00:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC) No, why do you guys always merge things???? It's fine and a well written article. Mr.Centreville —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Centreville (talkcontribs) 21:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

No this character had a whole lot of tiem in season 6 so she deserves her own article. Also its not sure if the character will return in later seasons or so.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

The image File:Desperate housewives nice is better than good.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Angie Bolen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think this one has waited long enough. Will review it soon. Ruby 2010/2013 05:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • It would be easier to just provide the necessary wikilink for ABC rather than adding the parenthesis
  • Angie is a "loving but tough Italian woman." -> Angie has been described by Cherry as a "loving but tough Italian woman."
  • When Julie rejects him once more, Danny attempts suicide by swallowing a large amount of pills -> When Julie rejects Danny once more, he attempts suicide by swallowing a large amount of pills
  • The reception section could be improved by adding [[File:Drea de Matteo 2.jpg]] and splitting the paragraph in two.
A well-written article. I will be happy to pass it after the above comments are addressed. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 04:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. Passing for GA. Keep up the good work. Ruby 2010/2013 01:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angie Bolen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angie Bolen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angie Bolen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Absences

edit

You Gotta Get a Gimmick Lovely Epiphany Goojrr (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply