Talk:Anna Burke
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anna Burke article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Anna Burke (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 20 February 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anna Burke has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 7, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Anna Burke appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 02:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- ... that while Deputy Speaker, Anna Burke ordered a cardboard cut-out of the Prime Minister to be removed from the House? Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-02-22/cardboard-rudd-sparks-uproar-in-parliament/1050656
- ALT1: ... that Anna Burke was the second woman to become speaker of the Australian House of Representatives? Source: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/anna-burke-people-like-myself-can-t-keep-knocking-back-honours-20190125-p50tk5.html
- ALT2: ... that Anna Burke was the second woman to give birth while a member of the Australian House of Representatives? Source: https://www.aph.gov.au/visit_parliament/art/stories_and_histories/hmc/~/link.aspx?_id=32929F6279A2442AA4C8D27023A5FA4F
- Reviewed:
- Comment: First DYK, a little unsure of wording so happy to be corrected for any of these :)
Improved to Good Article status by GraziePrego (talk). Self-nominated at 01:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Anna Burke; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: The article meets the WP:DYKCRIT, and has recently been promoted to GA-class. All the hooks are interesting, I personally think that ALT2 is the most interesting. If you are also happy with ALT2, I am happy to approve the hook. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also, in relation to ALT0, for flow, the word
while
at the start should be removed, the wordPrime Minister
should be lowercase per WP:JOBTITLE and should also link to Prime Minister of Australia instead of Kevin Rudd to avoid an WP:EASTEREGG, however this doesn't need to be rectified if ALT2 is used. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC) - I’m happy with ALT2 :) thank you for your comments. GraziePrego (talk) 10:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done, ALT2 it is! ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Is it appropriate to list the Prime Ministers the speaker has served under?
editI recognise that the Speaker is meant to discipline all MPs so it doesn't really matter who the Prime Minister is but the Speaker sometimes changes with a new parliamentary term and a new Prime Minister. This precedent is not present on other Speaker Wikipedia pages so I'm not sure whether to update most of them with this detail or remove it entirely from this and any other pages. If I get the approval for adding the Prime Ministers similar to this page should I update the infobox on most former and future speakers with that parliamentary term's Prime Minister(s)? Qwerty123M (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think the Prime Minister should be included in the Speaker infobox. As you say, the Speaker is technically a quasi-independent role, elected by the House; not appointed or selected by, or subservient to the prime minister of the day. --Canley (talk) 01:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Removed text
editI've removed the following text from the article. I've left it here in case its removal breaks any named references, and for the benefit of future editors. See the article's history for full attribution.
This text box doesn't seem directly relevant to the section where it was paced but it might be useful elsewhere. Also, per WP:MOS, we shouldn't use pullquotes in articles.
I nominate the member for Chisholm today because the member for Chisholm is, quite correctly, a member of the government and should take the chair as Speaker ... The member for Chisholm is a member of integrity and honesty who would fill the role of Speaker with absolute aplomb.
Christopher Pyne, Hansard, 24 November 2011[1]
Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)