Talk:Annika Sörenstam

Latest comment: 8 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleAnnika Sörenstam has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 26, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
January 16, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
March 7, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 22, 2011, and May 22, 2013.
Current status: Good article

Let's see her face

edit

Extraordinary that an article on one of the world's greatest female golfers doesn't show her face.

Are there no publicly-available images of the woman showing her front-on, with no sunglasses?

Vijay

edit

About Vijay's comments: it is tough to find out what he really said, and I didn't see his comments on TV. The media apparently twisted it around somewhat, and quoted him on some things, but left out other parts, which didn't lead to a complete quoting of what he really said. dave 01:24 19 May 2003 (UTC)

Well done. Assuming those are from televised comments, or from newsprint and he was quoted correctly. Thanks. dave 19:54 19 May 2003 (UTC)

Some discussion on how to reference the fact that Sorenstam was born in Sweden has taken place recently (given the edits in the past few hours). I'd be interested in comments from others on my talk page on the subject. - Cafemusique 22:03 23 May 2003 (UTC)


I've swapped the redirect and the article, so the article is now titled with the correct spelling, and the accentless version is a redirect. --Brion 18:22 24 May 2003 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annika Sörenstam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annika Sörenstam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page needs a tremendous amount of work. 13 citation needed tags. The "Professional wins" section is completely uncited. Schierbecker (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
All results are here
Source:
I placed the ref in the Professional wins section.
Ryder Cup controversy source also in place.
Regards, EEJB (talk) 11:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[svara]Reply
  1. ^ "Spelare, Annika Sörenstam, Samtliga tävlingsresultat i kronologisk ordning" [Player, Annika Sörenstam, All tournament results in chronological order] (in Swedish). Swedish Golf Federation and Golf Data AB. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
EEJB (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
User:EEJB, do you think this is worth saving? I have limited time, but I can lend a hand in improving. Schierbecker (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Looks like the nominator's concerns have been mostly addressed. Just about everything looks cited. I see only one cn tag left. If it can't be addressed, worst case that sentence could just be removed. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
This article is coming along, but the Professional wins, Major championships and LPGA Tour record sections are almost completely uncited. Schierbecker (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
The "Professional wins" section already has two citations that cover the whole section. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Keep, Sources put in place. Hope it's enough. Regards, EEJB (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.