Talk:Anqa
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
How is this close
editsee all links and sources
also there is nothing about heron simurgh
only anqa referenced as heron
as I stated before, Anqa is Confused and actually associated with all mythical birds
because anqa term used as example for non-existent birds in arab parables
أبو السعد 22 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
also anqa can't be simurgh or phoenix
because all three birds have their own myths in Arabian and Persian Culture
أبو السعد 22 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- أبو السعد 22, the article cited two contemporary sources which I think can be used by editors without the need for original research: an Encyclopedia Britannica page [1], and a page hosted on a Columbia University server [2]. The Britannica page says that an alternative title for this subject is
sīmorgh
. It further includes a link to their article for Phoenix, which saysIn Islamic mythology the phoenix was identified with the ʿanqāʾ (Persian: sīmorgh), a huge mysterious bird (probably a heron)
. The Columbia source includes a definition for anqa, which reads as follows:ʿanqā : '(fem. of aʿnaq , 'long-necked'; rt. ʿanq 'to be long in the neck'), s.m. A fabulous bird, the phœnix; a rara avis (syn. sīmurġh ); —adj. Scarce, rare, hard to get or find; wonderful, curious' (Platts p.766)
. So we've got a reliable source (Britannica) and a source of unclear reliability (Columbia, although it seems like it's quoting a third source, Platts, which is likely reliable) saying that they are synonyms, and no contemporary sources saying that they aren't synonyms. If you have modern reliable sources (non-English is fine) that argue that simorgh and anqa are two distinct concepts, they would help establish a case that these concepts should not be covered in the same article.
- أبو السعد 22, the article cited two contemporary sources which I think can be used by editors without the need for original research: an Encyclopedia Britannica page [1], and a page hosted on a Columbia University server [2]. The Britannica page says that an alternative title for this subject is
- Moreover, it's a pretty common practice for Wikipedia articles about mythology to include mentions of similar concepts in various cultures. See Dragon, Ghost, Naga or Jinn for examples. In some cases, enough sources have been found discussing a given culture's specific version of a creature to meet notability guidelines and create an article (for example Dybbuk for ghosts in Jewish culture). In other cases, this threshold has not been met and all information is written in a section of the main article (such as the African folklore section of Ghost, or the Other traditions section of Naga). signed, Rosguill talk 04:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Rosguill First of all there is no mention of Anqa anywhere in the Simurgh page. For the title of a page that redirects to another, at least that title should appear somewhere in the target page unless it is a direct translation/calque or etymologically related somehow, for example Drake and Dragon. Secondly, for example, the Dragon page has a section on the Japanese dragon but still the Japanese dragon has a page of its own.
- Moreover, it's a pretty common practice for Wikipedia articles about mythology to include mentions of similar concepts in various cultures. See Dragon, Ghost, Naga or Jinn for examples. In some cases, enough sources have been found discussing a given culture's specific version of a creature to meet notability guidelines and create an article (for example Dybbuk for ghosts in Jewish culture). In other cases, this threshold has not been met and all information is written in a section of the main article (such as the African folklore section of Ghost, or the Other traditions section of Naga). signed, Rosguill talk 04:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thirdly, the concept of Anqa is native to Arabian mythology and it was later identified with the Simurgh (which I mentioned in the "Identification" section) exactly how the Faun of Roman myth is identified with the Greek Satyr. They may be used synonymously but that does not mean they are the same. Ash wki (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing additional sources to the article. As it stands, I'm still uncertain whether the sources are enough to demonstrate that the subjects are independently notable (which would be required in order for your second or third point to be valid), but we at least have enough coverage in sources for me to want another new page reviewer weigh in on this as opposed to insisting on reverting here and now. signed, Rosguill talk 21:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thirdly, the concept of Anqa is native to Arabian mythology and it was later identified with the Simurgh (which I mentioned in the "Identification" section) exactly how the Faun of Roman myth is identified with the Greek Satyr. They may be used synonymously but that does not mean they are the same. Ash wki (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
What
editI have many modern sources
I will send all source in talk-page
but it is still your Reliable source say that anqa has many radical differences with Simurgh
Simurgh is Peacock while Anqa is Heron
I think anqa is arabian version of phoenix not simurgh
I don't know why are confusing Simurgh with Phoenix, there are many radical differences, only common feature being mythical Avian
how is simurgh close to phoenix
What is the exact sources?
editOne source claims that Qazwini mentions that Anqa lives at Mount Qaf. Where exactly does he mention it? The given source is weak and not clear. 137.22.90.2 (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)