Talk:Anthony Albanese
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anthony Albanese article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Anthony Albanese was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 7, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Infobox looks weird
editHoping this makes sense - the officeholder infobox across every single page appears to have slightly changed on desktop but in doing so it seems to have made the Anthony Albanese officeholder infobox super wide?
Not sure why and not a major thing but would probably look visually better if that's addressed, hoping other people know what I mean Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 22:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I should clarify, it seems a lot of things have been changed on Wiki overnight
- Point stands about the AA infobox being oddly wide though Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- It looks OK to me.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Huh, it also looks fine to me now
- Nevermind then, no issue Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- It looks OK to me.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Qantas corruption allegations
editsky news Australia will not shut up about Albanese allegedly using his position to get free first class on Qantas flights.
This is severe corruption if true which it likely is (there are lots published partially which date as far backs as his tenure as transport Minister.) allegedly some bribery in the part of the head of Qantas. 49.3.1.177 (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- i meant to say logs not lots. 49.3.1.177 (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Referral to ICC edit request <semi-protected>
editI suggest the following addition in light of Anthony Albanese being the first Western leader to be referred to the ICC as Accessory to Genocide in Gaza.
In July 2024, the Office of the Prosecutor – International Criminal Court (OTP-ICC) accepted an Article 15 Communication by Sydney law firm Birchgrove Legal identifying Anthony Albanese as an accessory to genocide. The communiqué cited the complicity of Albanese and other ministers from the Australian Labor and Liberal parties in the Israeli aggression in Gaza, which has been found to plausibly constitute genocide by the International Court of Justice. Albanese was the first Western leader to be referred to the ICC as an accessory to genocide.
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/genocide-complicity-claim-against-pm-albanese-accepted-icc
https://www.commondreams.org/news/australian-pm-icc
https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203454 Cicle314 (talk) 10:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Being the first at something usually means doing something that stands out ahead of the rest of the field. That doesn't seem to be the case here. Something could probably be included, but without any emphasis on being the first. HiLo48 (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- WorkersBushTelegraph (run by Karen Brewer I believe) and Socialist Alliance's Green Left Weekly? Some amazingly reliable sources. Not. TarnishedPathtalk 10:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not happy with the sources regarding the acceptance of the evidence? Then use this one instead: https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/genocide-complicity-claim-against-australian-pm-added-to-the-iccs-palestine-investigation/
- It is factual that he was the first; I don't see why it shouldn't be included. It doesn't need to be foregrounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicle314 (talk • contribs) 12:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's simply not significant that he was the first. Even mentioning it could imply to some readers that his actions were worse than those of everyone else. Do we actually know how he came to be the first? HiLo48 (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I assume it is because the law firm that referred him was the first law firm in a Western country to do so. Regardless, whether or not we can reach a consensus about the relevance of him being the first, the fact of his referral and the acceptance of that referral into evidence by the ICC nevertheless stands. So, I hope to see this added to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicle314 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- That source is clearly a blog (it's in the URL). Please refer to WP:BLPSPS. TarnishedPathtalk 02:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's simply not significant that he was the first. Even mentioning it could imply to some readers that his actions were worse than those of everyone else. Do we actually know how he came to be the first? HiLo48 (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)