Talk:Anthony Albanese

Latest comment: 10 days ago by TarnishedPath in topic Referral to ICC edit request <semi-protected>

Infobox looks weird

edit

Hoping this makes sense - the officeholder infobox across every single page appears to have slightly changed on desktop but in doing so it seems to have made the Anthony Albanese officeholder infobox super wide?

Not sure why and not a major thing but would probably look visually better if that's addressed, hoping other people know what I mean Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 22:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Actually I should clarify, it seems a lot of things have been changed on Wiki overnight
Point stands about the AA infobox being oddly wide though Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
It looks OK to me.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Huh, it also looks fine to me now
Nevermind then, no issue Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Qantas corruption allegations

edit

sky news Australia will not shut up about Albanese allegedly using his position to get free first class on Qantas flights.

This is severe corruption if true which it likely is (there are lots published partially which date as far backs as his tenure as transport Minister.) allegedly some bribery in the part of the head of Qantas. 49.3.1.177 (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

i meant to say logs not lots. 49.3.1.177 (talk) 10:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Referral to ICC edit request <semi-protected>

edit

I suggest the following addition in light of Anthony Albanese being the first Western leader to be referred to the ICC as Accessory to Genocide in Gaza.

In July 2024, the Office of the Prosecutor – International Criminal Court (OTP-ICC) accepted an Article 15 Communication by Sydney law firm Birchgrove Legal identifying Anthony Albanese as an accessory to genocide. The communiqué cited the complicity of Albanese and other ministers from the Australian Labor and Liberal parties in the Israeli aggression in Gaza, which has been found to plausibly constitute genocide by the International Court of Justice. Albanese was the first Western leader to be referred to the ICC as an accessory to genocide.

Sources: https://birchgrovelegal.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ICC-Referral-Australian-Government-Ministers-and-Opposition-Leader-04032024_BLG.pdf

https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/genocide-complicity-claim-against-pm-albanese-accepted-icc

https://workersbushtelegraph.com.au/2024/07/18/icc-investigates-australian-government-leaders-complicity-in-genocide/

https://www.commondreams.org/news/australian-pm-icc

https://www.icj-cij.org/node/203454 Cicle314 (talk) 10:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Being the first at something usually means doing something that stands out ahead of the rest of the field. That doesn't seem to be the case here. Something could probably be included, but without any emphasis on being the first. HiLo48 (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
WorkersBushTelegraph (run by Karen Brewer I believe) and Socialist Alliance's Green Left Weekly? Some amazingly reliable sources. Not. TarnishedPathtalk 10:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not happy with the sources regarding the acceptance of the evidence? Then use this one instead: https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/genocide-complicity-claim-against-australian-pm-added-to-the-iccs-palestine-investigation/
It is factual that he was the first; I don't see why it shouldn't be included. It doesn't need to be foregrounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicle314 (talkcontribs) 12:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's simply not significant that he was the first. Even mentioning it could imply to some readers that his actions were worse than those of everyone else. Do we actually know how he came to be the first? HiLo48 (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, I assume it is because the law firm that referred him was the first law firm in a Western country to do so. Regardless, whether or not we can reach a consensus about the relevance of him being the first, the fact of his referral and the acceptance of that referral into evidence by the ICC nevertheless stands. So, I hope to see this added to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicle314 (talkcontribs) 01:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
That source is clearly a blog (it's in the URL). Please refer to WP:BLPSPS. TarnishedPathtalk 02:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply