Talk:Antonio Francisco Xavier Alvares
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Khazar2 in topic removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antonio Francisco Xavier Alvares article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from René Vilatte was split to Antonio Francisco Xavier Alvares on 2013-12-17T21:45:34. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:René Vilatte. |
NPOV un-encyclopaediac language etc
editI have made a start but the article reads like an encomium of Alvarez. Also phrases like "following in the steps of his master" are not appropriate. Extensive inline referencing is needed, and preferably more sources. The language is somewhat - nay! very - stilted. "Wherin the room smelled..." not to say wrong. Rich Farmbrough, 14:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC).
- "The citizen committee lead by the Chief Justice, arranged to give a grand funeral to this Patriot and Saint. " What manner of capitalisation is this? never mind the POV. Rich Farmbrough, 14:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC).
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)