Talk:Aqua (Kingdom Hearts)

Artwork

Can't we use the official 3D artwork from the game instead of the conceptual drawing? SeanWheeler (talk) 20:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree....I think it would be better to use the one seen in the game, rather than the artwork. Doesn't xion and roxas have there own?`Bread Ninja (talk) 21:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

This sounds like wp:other stuff. The reason why Roxas' article uses a 3D image is because its the only that features his most notable traits.Tintor2 (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

That's more of a keep, delete, or move discussion. I think the image we have now is better suited for creation and concept section while a image of aqua portrayed in the game would be more recognizable. Same with terra and ventus. I dont know about sora though.Bread Ninja (talk) 23:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

The point is that such images need to be have a specific fair use rationale to explain where it comes from (a reliable source is better than the wikia). An artwork suited for conception would be one from development rather than the official one (like Sora's one in which he has a tail).Tintor2 (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Then we shouldn't have to worry so much. I'm sure someone could find one. You practically said the same thing i have.Bread Ninja (talk) 01:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The problem is sourcing well the 3D image.Tintor2 (talk) 02:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Why is it harder than this one? If we find one similar to how Roxas and Xion's are. I dont think we will have much of a problem.Bread Ninja (talk) 02:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Deletion request

She's far too minor of a character too have her own article. Plus, this is far too detailed. Is this really even necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.53.83.88 (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aqua (Kingdom Hearts). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926163108/http://palgn.com.au/sony-psp/17292/kingdom-hearts-birth-by-sleep-review/ to http://palgn.com.au/sony-psp/17292/kingdom-hearts-birth-by-sleep-review/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)