 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Issues
editThere are a total of eight major issues with this article that I am capable of tagging, which may be enough to warrant removal.
The subject of the article is a moth in the Cossidae family, and contains absolutely no other information on the creature, which warrants tags for non-notability, too short a lead section, and required attention from an expert.
The article contains one reference to a catalog page at the website of London's Natural History Museum, and there are no footnotes to it. This warrants tags for reliance on a single source, original research, and a need for more references.
The article is also a member page of two visible categories.
This article is in need of immediate expansion. It may be a new article, but there is no need for it to be this short. I am Quibilia. (talk) 23:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- A partner of mine takes care of this stuff. Don't raise issues where there are none. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you. I am Quibilia. (talk) 23:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)