Talk:Araucanía Region

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 8 June 2018
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Araucanía Region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I made a few grammatical changes to this artile under the Granary of Chile section. I was trying to smoothen out the language where it was a little choppy. Thanks! --Nolanrose (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

lupine

edit

By "lupine", do they mean Lupinus albus, known in Spanish as "altramuz"? Jonur (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Araucanía Region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 June 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Please note that Wikipedia does not necessarily use official names (WP:OFFICIAL) or legal names according to particular jurisdictions unless they are also the most common forms in English. Dekimasuよ! 01:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


Araucanía RegionLa Araucanía Region – According to the Law 21.074, the region name is "La Araucanía". Diego Grez-Cañete already moved the article, but it was reverted as a "controversial change". So, I want some opinions and reach concensus before renaming it (and related articles) Amitie 10g (talk) 01:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, this may be a valid reason to reject the rename, but the ultimate source is the Law. The problem is that there are policies and guidelines that contradicts ones with others, and the community may adopt something or something else based on their POV, most of the time based in the language and common name (China and Taiwan talk pages where I participated are good examples). So, what should be the more correct name for the article? For the record, Los Ríos Region and Los Lagos Region are named as is, but this is a somewhat different case, since "Ríos" and "Lagos" are common words and also surnames.
However, the contents should remain as "La Araucanía" without ommiting the "La". --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.