Talk:Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher

Computing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Void typesetting introduction?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why do we need the introduction to typesetting? A link to such a place should suffice. --Mortense (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

What is "chevron delimited mark-up"?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is "chevron delimited mark-up" the correct term? Does it refer to angle brackets mark-up?

Chevron may refer to guillemets, "«" and "»". --Mortense (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

redirect about Arbortext

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Arbortext is linked in the article, but it redirects to the article itself. However this page is about the editing tool, and the link in the article to "Arbortext" should be to the organisation. This is confusing. When I read, I had the question "what the heck is Arbortext, then?".

Re-reading the article, the way I understand it, Arbortext is the name of the owners of the software 2004 to 2005, and also the name of their software suite. So the name stuck because it was integrated into that software suite. All this is rather clear from the article.

My suggestion: either there's a page for the Arbortext organisation (company?), and the ref should go there, or simply remove the ref. A link to the same page is useless and raises pointless questions.

I will implement my second and simpler solution. Feel free to roll back if inappropriate. --Jrob kiwi (talk) 08:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic