Talk:Arch Wolfe

Latest comment: 1 month ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 17:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Arch Wolfe; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  

QPQ:   - Not done
Overall:   @BeanieFan11: The whole article looks good to me. I just need the QPQ and you're good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Arch Wolfe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 13:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Added some cats.
  • He was in the MLB team's cat instead of the NFL one. I changed it.
  • Change lead to American professional football.
    • Changed.
  • "Chicago / St. Louis Cardinals from 1933" to "Chicago / St. Louis Cardinals of the National Football League (NFL) from 1933"
    • Changed.
  • No date for the pic I guess?
    • Added that it was in 1950.
  • "He worked with a rug-cleaning business owned by Charles Bidwill which led to his opportunity in sports" change to "future Chicago Cardinals executive Charles Bidwell"
    • Changed.
  • Once you change the above, we can probably remove "which led to his opportunity in sports" otherwise that sentence gets a little wordy?
    • Changed.
  • If you do the stuff above, then unlink Chicago Cardinals in the first sentence of the next section.
    • Changed.
  • "He served in the position of business manager and, starting in 1936, acted as their general manager" Add commas where bolded.
    • Changed.
  • Did you see in the navbox where it says he was an assistant coach? What's that all about?
    • That was added here (after I had created the article) – I changed it to "Executives" since he was not a coach.
  • Is there any info on where he went to high school or college or anything?
    • His early life was pretty obscure.

That's all. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.